Playing God in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Essay -- Frankenstein 2014

In his Poetics, Aristotle defines the tragic hero as a man of high social status who invites the gods to punish him through with(predicate) overbearing pride and/or precondition hubris. It would be simple to usurp the label of hubristic tragic hero to Victor Frankenstein, but such appointee of a label would be an oversimplification. The gods in Greek drama punish, albeit harshly, in an outright manner. The tragic figure is aware that the gods have forsaken him, and he resigns to tarry his life under the demands of retribution. Victor Frankensteins fate is not so simple fate is crueler to Victor and more spiteful than he could of all time be to the heavens. The question that precedes all others, however, is who is or what acts as god in Frankenstein. It is safe to assume that Victor Frankensteins god is that of the Christian tradition, although interestingly, he never truly mentions it as such. Instead, he invokes the spirits of nature and swears by the sacred earth on which he kneels that he will get his retaliate (Shelley 173) so it is only fitting that it is nature or the laws of nature that belief offended by Victors transgression and his vulgar presumption that he can emulate its force. What drives Victor to do so is a complicated issue, but what is rather clear is that the setting of the novel is rarified for such a crime. The distinction between natures powers and providential powers is a relatively new concept. For many ancient cultures, nature was inexorably tied to the ultimate spirit and although men could speak to the spirits, they were in no way like the spirits. Before altering any object in nature, one needed permission from these spirits. This changed with the growth of Christianity Christian... ...Ecocriticism ref Landmarks in literary Ecology. Ed. Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm. Athens University of Georgia calf love, 1996. 15-29. Mounce, H.O. Humes Naturalism. New York Routledge, 1999. Reich, Lou. Humes Religious Naturalism. Lanham University Press of America, Inc., 1998. Shelley, Mary. Case Studies in Contemporary unfavorable judgment Frankenstein. Ed. Johanna Smith. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2000. 28-189. Sherwin, Paul. Relativism and Literary Criticism The Case of Frankenstein. Aspects of Relativism Moral, Cognitive, and Literary. Ed. James E. Bayley. Lanham University Press of America, Inc., 1992. 25-39. White, Lynn. The Historical Roots of our Ecological Crisis. The Ecocriticism Reader Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Ed. Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm. Athens University of Georgia Press, 1996. 3-14. .