'Cachau Bant: Mind Your Language Essay\r'

'There has non been a daylight with peace on this earth. We always hear about war, magnate, loss, and corruption. Every politicians wants the power, wants to change something for the better, or what they think is better, without cognize what the signifi shtupces are. In the hold â€Å"Cachau Bant: Mind Your Language” tom truth expresses his opinion about the way the England has forced the chisel volume to learn English and forget their witness native vocabulary. I want to get out how gobbler Law presents his arguments by analyzing them using the pentagon, and analyze and comment on how he uses history. tom Law, the writer of the condition, is a Welsh man who lives in Wales. He is very irritated and furious with England because they sire forced the Welsh spate to change their aim tongue to English. Throughout the phrase, he tries to persuade the indorser to fight a contactst England’s tyranny against different languages than English. turkey co ck Law uses different strategies to convince the proofreaders’ and gain their empathy. His primary(prenominal) claim is that England is being tyrannical against the Welsh language, and that England has the power of one’s speech. He says, â€Å"It’s unassailable to give a toss about language when you’re an English speaker.\r\nBecause losing your language is not something you’ll incessantly set out to worry about; thanks to the exult days of the British Empire.” (Law, Tom. Cachau Bant: Mind Your Language. Page 6 ll. 1-5). He has different grounds for his claim. The first ground is that language was a choice that England make for the Welsh people including Tom Law himself. They did not establish the opportunity to choose for themselves, England made the choice for them. The separate ground is that England thought that it was better for the Welsh people. homogeneous mentioned earlier, Tom Law is irritated and furious with England, and we evict especi exclusivelyy see that in the way he writes. The language is informal, and the sentences are short, â€Å"The Welsh language has declined so rapidly because the English placed a perch over its face and smothered it.” (P. 7 ll. 120-123).\r\nHe likewise uses a lot of irony, for example he says, â€Å"[…] the glory days of the British Empire. English is a dominant language- the third most common in the world. It’s a source of national pride- a gift to the planet.” That makes the reader feel that England is actually nought but a small country that does not make a good difference for anybody if England does not get something good from it. His tone in the article is very ostracise; we can see that numerous places in schoolbook. One of the places is where he says, â€Å"It was done by England and it continues to tear the country apart, affecting every picture of Welsh life.” (P.7 ll. 74-76) Another place in the text that learns that the tone is negative is when he says, â€Å"It’s the consequence of the state treating the Welsh language as a sickness which needed to be cured”. (P.8 ll. 135-137). The crusade is that he is annoyed and angry with England.\r\nTom Law uses history as a device to show the reader that England has been do loss and trouble in galore(postnominal) other countries, and they are still causing loss and trouble. He says, â€Å"It has leftfield non- Welsh speakers touch like out expressionrs in their own country, forever left out in the cold and staring clog up in at history and culture they can’t access; at jobs they’re not qualified to do. For Welsh speakers, they have been battered from all sides, endlessly under attack, having to scarcelyify the use of their own language- mostly to fellow Welsh people.” (P.9 ll. 227-236) The article is characterized by pathos. â€Å"The â€Å"WN” initials were carved onto a governing body which school kid s were made to wear around their neck if heard talk Welsh in classroom. The pupil wearing the plaque at the end of the day would be beaten.” (P. 9 ll. 211-217) The reader will immediately feel speculative and get empathy for the Welsh people. He also uses logos, for example, he says that back in the 1840s, around 80 pct of people living in Wales spoke Welsh, and legion(predicate) of them spoke no English at all, and in the year 2011 had the number dropped down to below 20 percent.\r\nWhen the reader reads this, Tom Law will gain some readers’ nurse, because is strengthens his argument. Furthermore, he also tries to engage the reader by asking questions â€Å"What can you do?” (P. 7 l.117) This question makes the reader to think about an attend to what we can do, and this makes a kind of community. Besides that, the article needs more ethos. He does not have any expert’s estimation to apply his claims, and that causes that the grounds of his claims are weak. If he had some experts or some data, the ethos of the article would be stronger, and he would plausibly gain a lot more readers’ vigilance and support. Tom Law tries to reach support and empathy from people that has the same way of thinking.\r\nHe tries to convince people who feel the same hatred against England as him. He tries to persuade people who feel lost, because England was the one who caused a lot of loss in many countries. That is also the reason why he uses some of England’s history in the article, to reach the people who feels lost, the ones not knowing who they really are. That is his primary hearing. The secondary audience is the nation of England. He is trying to tell England to, not to interfere in other countries’ language.\r\nThe intention of the article is that Tom Law tries to convince the reader to support his opinion. He wants England to stop interfering in other countries, and just keep their business in England. Tom Law’s tone is very negative towards England and he does not see it from the opposite side of the discussion. If he saw the discussion from both sides, the article would be more trustworthy, and he would win a lot more support. If England had not force many countries to change their native tongue or just taught other countries the language, another countries would have done it.. Actually, you should be thankful to England. If England did not do what is has done, today, we would not be able to understand each other.\r\n'